[ptx] nona vs. PTStitcher

[Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)]

Le 06.04.2005 19:53:20, John Bäckstrand a écrit :
> Bruno Postle wrote:
>> On Wed 06-Apr-2005 at 18:36 +0200, Benoit POSTE wrote:
>> 
>>>> 2. Distributing PTStitcher just reduces the likelyhood of somebody
>>>>   getting annoyed enough to add the missing features to nona.
>>> 
>>>   What's missing in Nona?
>> - Automatic colour/brightness correction.
> 
> Just chipping in here. Recently did a pano from some images taken by  
> hand with no exposure commonality, and it turned out enblend was  
> unable to fix the differences in brightness, while autopanos  
> corrections worked (I  used enblend on the result from ptstitcher  
> though).
> 
> Not a fault of nonas, though, and I agree that nona should be  
> emphasised.

I remarked that a nona assembly with enblend called from hugin is not  
as smooth as playing enblend from multi-tiff in a terminal after  
stitching with Pstitcher.

I remarked also that even if I ask multi-tiff to Nona, I get a single  
tiff panorama.

> 
> ---
> John Bäckstrand
> 
> 

Regards

Jean-Luc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.email-lists.org/pipermail/ptx/attachments/20050406/6dd6ae18/attachment.bin