[ptx] Updated patch

[Mike Runge]

Sorry,

typo in the second link, should be:

#1 http://www.trozzreaxxion.net/misc/multilayer.mov
#2 http://www.trozzreaxxion.net/misc/multitiff.mov

best, mike



Mike Runge wrote:

>Works fine, but ...
>
>it has a problem with enblend parameter "-w" (blending over 360 deg).
>Please have a look at this 2 mov-files (created with panocube). The pano
>isn't finished, just look for the visble vertical stitch edge at -180/+180
>(no need to rotate the mov)
>
>#1 http://www.trozzreaxxion.net/misc/multilayer.mov
>#2 http://www.trozzreaxxion.net/misc/multiltiff.mov
>
>#1 was created running the patched enblend on base of nona multilayered tiff
>output.
>#2 was created running the patched enblend on base of ptstitcher multiple
>tiff output.
>
>Hmm,
>any ideas?!
>
>best, mike
>
>)
>On 6/22/2004, "Pablo d'Angelo" <pablo.dangelo at web.de> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Ian Sydenham wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
>>>>I have uploaded a win32 binary to
>>>>http://wurm.wh-wurm.uni-ulm.de/~redman/enblend.exe
>>>>
>>>>Crosscompiled and not tested.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Thanks for the work guys in putting this patch together. I've tested the
>>>patched enblend and it did not run for me on W2k. A console session and
>>>output follows:
>>>      
>>>
>>Ups, I forgot to define some define needed for compilation under windows.
>>I don't know where __GW32C__ is defined, maybe it would be better to use
>>__MINGW__ or WIN32, because these seem to be defined by the compilers
>>themself.
>>
>>I have updated
>>
>>http://wurm.wh-wurm.uni-ulm.de/~redman/enblend.exe
>>
>>Should work better now. (I hope)
>>
>>ciao
>> Pablo
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>