[ptx] x64 benchmarks

[Lars Schimmer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Galloway wrote:
> yes, mine are quite stable as well:
> 
> mgx at larch:~> cat /etc/SuSE-release
> SuSE Linux 9.3 (x86-64)
> VERSION = 9.3
> mgx at larch:~> uname -a
> Linux larch 2.6.11.4-21.8-smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 19 12:42:37 UTC 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> mgx at larch:~> uptime
>  12:35pm  up 149 days  3:45,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:31:54PM +0100, Marek Januszewski wrote:
> 
>>On Cz Stycznia 19 2006, 5:27 pm, Bruno Postle wrote:
>>
>>
>>>As an aside, my amd64 server is horribly unstable with kernel
>>>oops'es every few days - Not very impressive so far.

I just can tell, my debian amd64-etch ist rock solid, 30 days at work
and no problem so far. Just some small missing features (no mplayer
win-codec-pack e.g.).
I suggest you take another system than SuSe :-)

To be OnTopic: I haven't measured the speed, but I assume 64bit t be
slightly faster than 32bit. Til yet I haven't found a real safe way to
really make a test.

>>Pozdrawiam/Best regards,
>>Marek
>>
>>

Cya
Lars
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------
TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung
Tel.: +43 316 873-5405       E-Mail: l.schimmer at cgv.tugraz.at
NEW PGP KEY! NEW!  PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723 NEW!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD0KpBmWhuE0qbFyMRAo2UAJ9wWEjGmTXsGl8Q6Y0e2X7MlZPd+QCeKuyy
FNhB9NExgJgY8k4+CxaYUkQ=
=TFd8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----