[ptx] nona vs. PTStitcher

Mike Runge mike at trozzreaxxion.net
Fri Apr 8 13:25:25 BST 2005


Very, very interesting ideas!!!

best, mike


On 4/8/2005, "Bruno Postle" <bruno at postle.net> wrote:

>On Wed 06-Apr-2005 at 18:36 +0200, Benoit POSTE wrote:
>>
>> > 2. Distributing PTStitcher just reduces the likelyhood of somebody
>> >    getting annoyed enough to add the missing features to nona.
>>
>>    What's missing in Nona?
>
>A couple of other things that could be added to nona that are not in
>PTStitcher:
>
>- Radial luminance correction.  There was a very interesting
>  suggestion to the panotools list for this:
>
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.panotools/26390
>
>  ..basically, if you have two overlappiing images with identical
>  radial brightness falloff, then it should be possible to calculate
>  the falloff curve precisely just by looking at the differences
>  between the two images.
>
>- Chromatic abberation correction.  Nona could become capable of
>  remapping each RGB channel seperately.
>
>  There ought to be a way of determining this automatically just by
>  looking at a photo.
>
>--
>Bruno
>
>


More information about the ptX mailing list