[ptx] nona vs. PTStitcher
Mike Runge
mike at trozzreaxxion.net
Fri Apr 8 13:25:25 BST 2005
Very, very interesting ideas!!!
best, mike
On 4/8/2005, "Bruno Postle" <bruno at postle.net> wrote:
>On Wed 06-Apr-2005 at 18:36 +0200, Benoit POSTE wrote:
>>
>> > 2. Distributing PTStitcher just reduces the likelyhood of somebody
>> > getting annoyed enough to add the missing features to nona.
>>
>> What's missing in Nona?
>
>A couple of other things that could be added to nona that are not in
>PTStitcher:
>
>- Radial luminance correction. There was a very interesting
> suggestion to the panotools list for this:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.panotools/26390
>
> ..basically, if you have two overlappiing images with identical
> radial brightness falloff, then it should be possible to calculate
> the falloff curve precisely just by looking at the differences
> between the two images.
>
>- Chromatic abberation correction. Nona could become capable of
> remapping each RGB channel seperately.
>
> There ought to be a way of determining this automatically just by
> looking at a photo.
>
>--
>Bruno
>
>
More information about the ptX
mailing list