[ptx] difference between rectangular and cylindrycal pano
Yili Zhao
ylzhao at vip.sina.com
Sun Oct 31 01:23:18 BST 2004
Hi Rik,
How about the cubic projection? It seems that cubic projection has some relationship
with equirectangular projection?
Best regards,
Yili
======= 2004-10-29 11:12:42 Rik wrote:=======
>Marek,
>
>PTviewer assumes that its input image is equirectangular projection,
>possibly less than full spherical 360x180 degrees. For partial panos
>with small fov, there is not much difference between equirectangular and
>rectilinear or cylindrical, so visually it works OK to use those with
>PTviewer also.
>
>Whether you should use rectilinear or cylindrical for website and
>printing depends on what you are trying to accomplish. With
>rectilinear, all lines that are straight in the world are also straight
>in your picture, but you get severe distortion if you try to go beyond
>roughly 120 degrees fov. With cylindrical, the horizon and verticals
>are the only straight lines in the world that end up straight in your
>picture, but you can go up to full 360 degrees horizontal.
>
>Cylindrical and equirectangular have many of the same characteristics --
>up to a full circle around, vertical lines in the world are also
>vertical in your picture, things near the poles get badly distorted.
>The difference is that in equirectangular, you can go clear to the poles
>and things near the poles get "squashed" vertically, where in
>cylindrical they get "stretched" and you can go only about +-60 degrees
>vertically before distortion gets too much. (PTViewer remaps from
>equirectangular input to rectilinear on the screen, so when you look up,
>you see an undistorted view of the stuff above you.)
>
>For technical discussion and pictures using maps of the Earth, see
>http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EquirectangularProjection.html ,
>http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CylindricalProjection.html, and
>http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RectilinearProjection.html , which links to
>http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GnomonicProjection.html . (What
>photographers call "rectilinear" projection, geographers call
>"gnomonic". It's not immediately obvious that gnomonic projection maps
>lines that are straight in 3D to lines that are straight in the map, but
>it does.)
>
>--Rik
>
>spec wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> What exatly is the difference if I stitch pano as rectangular and
>> cylindrical? As I understand it both are good to present a result as
>> an image on a website or sth., and both are good to present pano as
>> cylindrical pano in ptviewer. With equirectangular it's a whole
>> different story - that I understand.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Marek
>>
>>
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
More information about the ptX
mailing list