[ptx] nona and hugin

[JD Smith]

On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 17:34, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004, JD Smith wrote:
> 
> > And for all those users with existing PTStitcher script files who may
> > want to use nona, has there been any headway bringing the .pto script to
> > match the traditional Panotools script syntax?  If hugin is to have a
> > different script syntax, it should probably be a lot better than
> > Panotool's, not just slightly different.
> 
> hugin uses the script syntax that PTOptimizer uses.
> 
> I hacked in support for project files from PTGui and PTAssembler,
> but I think the sticher scripts that are written by PTGui and PTAsm are not
> parsed correctly yet. That is, scripts that contain both i and o lines, and
> where each lines contain a subset of the information (o lines - filename,
> i lines - parameters)
> I'll add support for this sometime soon.
> 
> In the long term future I'd like to use an xml format, as it is easier to
> extend and parse than the current script files.

Aha.. so just to be clear, I should be able to run nona on any existing
PanoTools script which PTOptimizer/PTStitcher can parse?  I'm not sure
why I thought there was a difference.

Thanks,

JD