windows compilation

[Mike Runge]

Ok,

message is understood ;-)

>Make sure that you are using the "auto finetune", this saves a lot of
>time, I think. Usually the control points are matched almost perfectly.
>And the auto matcher is quite fast (at least for small search areas).
>
>I just tried a 360 deg cylindrical, with 16 source images and the average
>control point error is below 1 pixel.
>

I wasn't aware if auto fine tune is working at all. If it works so reliable
and exact I agree, that additional controlpoint setting helpers are obsolet
and only confusing.

I have some panos taken with a good tripod and a very well working nodal
point adapter - I will work on these examples to workout in practise, how
good auto fine tune works. Really nice and outstanding feature - you guys are
doing more than just pretty interfaces ;-)

best, mike