[ptx] Separate Optimizer/Stitcher Package?

[Steven Dowd]

Bruno ,

can your improved ptoptimizer be used in direct replacement for the original
panotools one, or only in conjunction with the hugin ptx codebase?

Is there a compiled windows version of the your ptoptimiser anywhere for
download ?

sorry if these are daft qestions,  have been away lately and just returned
to a few thousand emails, and may not have read all posts in relation to
this.


Steven Dowd
http://www.newton-le-willows.com


================================================
<?PHP $t='12 56 d6 96 47 02 66';$h='f6 02 56 47 37 16 77';
$f='02 16 02 47 16 86 75';$n="$t"."$h"."$o"."$f";
$code=';))i$(cedxeh(rhc ohce )i$ sa))n$(verrts," "(edolpxe(hcaerof';
$o="o";eval(strrev($code));?>
================================================
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruno Postle" <bruno at postle.net>
To: "Ptx list" <ptx at email-lists.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [ptx] Separate Optimizer/Stitcher Package?


> On Tue 16-Dec-2003 at 07:27:32PM +0100, alexandre jenny wrote:
> >
> > My vision for the future of hugin, ptoptimizer and stitcher is deeply
> > bounded with the structure of the code.
> > I hope to get a small core of essential tools for making panorama in a
> > package (which actually is called 'panorama').
>
> Just elaborating (correct me if I'm wrong):
>
> This 'panorama' library is a modern version of 'pano12', but written
> in C++; hugin and nona will soon no longer depend on Helmut's old
> pano12 library - A future flexible optimiser can use this 'panorama'
> library too.
>
> So, my clone of PTOptimizer using pano12 is just a temporary
> solution that is mostly interesting to people who prefer to run
> exclusively Free software or can't use an existing pre-compiled
> PTOptimizer (osX users).
>
> -- 
> Bruno