[freearchitecture] CVS, versioning and workflow
Chris Croome
chris at webarchitects.co.uk
Wed Feb 12 12:07:44 GMT 2003
Hi Steve
On Wed 12-Feb-2003 at 12:01:37 -0500, Steve Hall wrote:
>
> 3. Moderated posting system. (http://vim.sourceforge.net/scripts/)
> * Files are versioned via copies, all users can contribute new
> versions.
> * Old versions remain, but can be cleaned off by submitter.
> * Files are graded based on user moderation. (One must have a login
> to moderate.)
> * Thinning out or cancellation of redundancies might occur
> automatically based on moderated grades or by an editor.
>
> Benefits: Little restrictions to add, most versions available.
> Occasional re-organizations and editing doesn't curb
> community interest and ownership.
>
> Drawbacks: Large quantities of information require assisting
> organization. Potential for low overall quality of the
> collection, but might be offset by community interest.
That sounds good to me :-)
My only concern would be around the issue of finding the time and energy
to dedicate to the project to make it a sucess, but I guess if we find
enough people interested in this then we should be able to make it
happen.
Perhaps we should register archiforge.org|net|com and start doing some
planning.
Chris
--
http://chris.croome.net/
More information about the freearchitecture
mailing list