[ptx] thoughts for hugin UI, post 0.5
douglas wilkins
dgswilkins at yahoo.co.uk
Fri May 27 07:00:01 BST 2005
--- Jim Watters <jwatters at photocreations.ca> wrote:
> I prefer 6 over 5. The layout is more readable. The only thing I would
> change is to right justify the labels of horizontal, vertical and so
> forth down to compression. I believe this is standard HCI for Mac but
> Windows is left justified. Regardless I find it easier on the eyes with
> the labels right justified.
What ever else a Mac might be, its' user interfaces are normally pleasing to
the eye. Rob, have you looked at the Aqua UI guidelines?
[snip]
> Interpolator are handled by libpano12, and I don't believe that
> PTStitcher would stop new interpolators from being passed to libpano12
> to be processed if libpano12 could handle them. But, there may be other
> things that PTStitcher can not do.
libpano is not the problem here. As far as I am aware, PTStitcher only accepts
a limited number of options, even if the the backend (libpano) can handle more.
>
> Depending on the Format that is selected there are different settings:
> Jpeg has a choice of progressing. Others have a choice of feathering.
>
> I am not sure of the purpose of "Use the custom settings above:" except,
> may be to save different settings as presets. If this is the case, then
> I would put this back to the top. Change it to something like "current
> settings" or "my saved settings" and a button to save new or modified
> settings and a button to delete existing settings.
Currently we have a number of presets, but the idea of being able to save and
then use "my saved setting" is a nice one I think. The other option might be a
"default" pto project that is loaded, although this would require more
substantial changes.
regards,
Doug
___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
More information about the ptX
mailing list