[ptx] Panotools check in m4

[Douglas Wilkins]

On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 21:38 +0200, Edouard Gomez wrote:
> The Panotools check is not flexible enough to cope with non
> standard lib/include dirs.
> 
> With gcc, CPATH can be used to specify aditional locations ofr
> include dirs, and LIBRARY_PATH does the same for libs to link
> against.
> 
> They follow the usual dir1:dir2:dir3 format, playing with the
> IFS variable should be enough to split the CPATH and
> LIBRARY_PATH vars and include them in the panotools check.
> 
Yes, it is not (yet) flexible enough. :-( 
Thanks for the suggestion, I will follow up.

Regards,
Doug