[ptx] autopano1.03 comparison to autopano-sift1.4

[Pablo d'Angelo]

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Ian Sydenham wrote:

> Summary:
> For this test the autopano-sift algorithm generated more control point 
> matches, and only found "proper" match points.
> Autopano1.03 was much much faster, but the output file still required 
> lots of manual changes to get a good image.
> 
> Is this comparison similar to anyone else's findings?

I experienced pretty much the same, so I'm using autopano-sift most
of the time.

ciao
  Pablo