[ptx] autopano #2, using SIFT
Pablo d'Angelo
pablo at mathematik.uni-ulm.de
Fri Jan 16 20:14:32 GMT 2004
Hi Alexandre,
> My opinion is that .NET is really cool for gui and interfacing beetween
> Languages or anything like that.
I'm sure .NET is a lot better than wxWindows for that (from a programmers
perspective).
> But for calculation, we should definitely
> Keep C/C++. So this hugin project generator will be in this language.
> Of course, using the same codebase is the good option.
ack. I have started to separate some of the image processing/calculation
stuff that has sneaked into the applications.
> > Something I'd like to see in any case is a clone of the
> > "keypoints" program, available on Dr. Lowe's site :)
>
> Keypoints just gives keypoints : it does not the matching.
Jep, thats why it is easy to call it externally, and read in the features.
even if the rest is written in c++, or available only as binary. I'm
currently researching with Dr. Lowe's linux binary implementation, but I
won't have time to learn and implement really advanced matching algorithms,
so I leave that to you.
> N-space neightboor finding sheme to hough transform is free. So if any issue
> arise from the using of sift feature, we could easy switch to a haris
> coner feature or Anyelse with keeping the matching sheme and matrices
> calculus.
*g* jep. Hmm, we should think about a code structure for that, so that there
is a clean interface to the matching, whatever algorithm is used.
ciao
Pablo
--
http://wurm.wohnheim.uni-ulm.de/~redman/
Please use PGP
More information about the ptX
mailing list