[ptx] panosifter problems & questions
Pablo d'Angelo
pablo at mathematik.uni-ulm.de
Tue Feb 17 10:04:47 GMT 2004
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Terje Mathisen wrote:
> Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
>
> >Actually, I'm not completely sure what the crop factor really is.
> >the ratio of the diagonals? Or the ratio of width, or height? Have seem
> >different interpretations on the web.
>
> You're right, I've even suspected PTAsm of getting this wrong for
> cameras which don't have a 3:2 aspect ratio, i.e. almost all digicams
> which have a 4:3 TV style chip.
>
> IMHO, the proper way would be to calculate all crop factors relative to
> a film/chip plane diagonal, since this diagonal determines the size of
> the optics, right?
I thought I've implemented it like that in hugin (but it breaks in case of a
missing exif sensor size). but probably, some bugs have slipped through.
Anyway, a proper lens handling is needed sometime.
> So a 24x36 lens has a 43.27 mm diagonal, while a "standard" small
> digicam uses a 1/1.8" chip which should have an 8.88 mm diagonal:
>
> 43.27/8.88 = 4.873
>
> Using Google, I find various sizes given for chips that should all be
> 1/1.8", but 7.1x5.3 mm seems typical, this corresponds well to the
> 7.104x5.328 which I get when starting with an 8.88 mm diagonal.
I was quite surprised when I found:
http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glossary/Camera_System/Sensor_Sizes_01.htm
ciao
Pablo
--
http://wurm.wohnheim.uni-ulm.de/~redman/
Please use PGP
More information about the ptX
mailing list