[ptx] various

[Bruno Postle]

Just forwarding some messages that didn't get through first time.

[Terje, your mail is being rejected because you are sending it to
ptx-bounces at email-lists.org instead of the correct address:
ptx at email-lists.org]

-- 
Bruno

> From: Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> Organization: Hydro
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:08:01 +0100
> To: ptx-bounces at email-lists.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> 	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
> Subject: Re: [ptx] On the organization of the hugin src
> 
> ptx-bounces at email-lists.org wrote:
> 
> >>3. Usage of wxWindows for the GUI (.. I'm not really happy with it too ..)
> >
> >However, I think wxWindows (now wxWidgets) is the best C++ based GUI for 
> >cross platform development. Has other candidates? 
> 
> I don't know how well these things really work, but would Qt (from 
> TrollTech) be a possibility?
> 
> Terje
> 
> -- 
> - <Terje.Mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"


> From: Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> Organization: Hydro
> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:56:04 +0100
> To: ptx-bounces at email-lists.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> 	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
> Subject: Re: [ptx] flat mosaics
> 
> ptx-bounces at email-lists.org wrote:
> 
> >  Hello Pablo,
> >
> >I often need flat mosaics in exact parallel perspective. As you 
> >certainly know this is not possible in Panotools. Here you can only 
> >choose a very small angle of approximately 1 degree for the angle of 
> >view and then optimize either view, roll, d, e or view, yaw, pitch, roll 
> >for every dependent image. This is discribed by Helmut Dersch for a 
> >MF-Scan. But for long facades mosaics this isn't correct enough.
> 
> I've done this when making mosaics of multiple maps, i.e. really 
> pure/flat image stitching, with no projection and/or lens distortion.
> 
> It can work OK by locking (a,b,c) to zero, and fixing FOV for the first 
> image, then allow all other images modify only vertical and horizontal 
> shift, along with roll and HFOV (to comensate for verying image sizes).
> 
> When this works, it works very well indeed.
> 
> However, afaik, only PTAssembler supports directly these parameters, not 
> Hugin.
> 
> Terje
> -- 
> - <Terje.Mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"


> From: Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> Organization: Hydro
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:03:00 +0200
> To: ptx-bounces at email-lists.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> 	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
> Subject: Re: [ptx] big panorama size - what to do?
> 
> ptx-bounces at email-lists.org wrote:
> 
> >On 0318, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> >>
> >>the nona tiff output it signinficantly smaller for panos with many
> >>images. But you need gimp > 2.0 pre 2.
> >
> >Nona cannot handle my panorama :(
> >I've 512 Mb of ram, and about 40 6Mpix images...
> >I have gimp of course :)
> 
> Ouch. That's too big. :-(
> 
> I've had 2 GB ram on a dual Xeon machine for a year now, that _really_ 
> helps on 700-800 MB multi-layer files.
> 
> Now I've also replaced my laptop with Dell M60 workstation, it has 2 GB 
> ram, 60 GB disk, and a 1920x1200 screen.
> 
> (And I didn't have to pay for it myself. :-)
> 
> Terje
> 
> -- 
> - <Terje.Mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"


> From: Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> Organization: Hydro
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:04:27 +0200
> To: ptx-bounces at email-lists.org
> Cc: morten.steien at hydro.com, ptx at email-lists.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> 	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
> Subject: Re: Re : [ptx] Enblend 1.0
> 
> ptx-bounces at email-lists.org wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Morten A. Steien wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I have the same problem with a panorama consisting of 7 images in one 
> >>horisontal
> >
> >
> >Is the anomaly a patch that looks out of place, or is it a horizontal or 
> >vertical line where the colors don't match up?
> >
> >It seems that there are two separate bugs that people have noticed.
> 
> I've seen Morten's results, they looked like one or more (vertical) 
> patches with bad color.
> 
> Terje
> 
> -- 
> - <Terje.Mathisen at hda.hydro.com>
> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"