<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Pablo d'Angelo wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid20040831193039.GA4407@svalbart">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Rik Littlefield wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Yes, the optimizer is in sourceforge cvs. No, fast stitching is not yet
in that cvs.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Are you sure? I've used the sourceforge cvs to do my amd benchmarks lately,
at it seemed to contain it (not sure which version though), see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://panotools.sourceforge.net/docs/changelog/libpano/Changelog">http://panotools.sourceforge.net/docs/changelog/libpano/Changelog</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
Oops, you're right! I should have checked the Changelog before
typing. Based on
the Changelog comments and what else I know about the codes, it looks
like the cvs version of fast stitching should be up-to-date except for
a glitch related to panoinfo reporting of options, found only with some
compilers and build options.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid20040831193039.GA4407@svalbart">
<pre wrap="">
However, the sourceforge site doesn't contain any binary, or link to
binaries, so its probably unuseable to use for the average windows user.
Maybe a link to Jim Watters site (with windows binaries)
and the linux binaries build by Bruno Postle would be quite useful, I think.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I agree, such links should appear on the sourceforge page. Hosting
binaries there would save Jim and Bruno some bandwidth, too. I will
talk with Jim about it. <font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><br>
<br>
--Rik</font><tt><br>
</tt><br>
</body>
</html>